Jeff Van Drew Is Party Switching Himself Into Oblivion

Jeff Van Drew Is Party Switching Himself Into Oblivion

Bias

Moderate Left Bias
This article has moderate left bias with a bias score of -62.73 from our political bias detecting A.I.


Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Janet Ybarra
Democrat
Former Washington Journalist
Contributor on The Bipartisan Press

Hover to Expand



Republicans no doubt are crowing over freshman Rep Jeff Van Drew’s decision to switch political parties, from Democratic to Republican, over his break about Donald Trump’s impeachment.

But, when all is said and done, Van Drew will be left crying over his decision for its perhaps the most foolish that he could have made in his young political career.


That Van Drew opposes impeachment is no secret, but it’s not an issue he had to switch parties over. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is smart enough to know that her members would have to go their own ways on impeachment. Many will support it, but some will oppose it for various reasons, and that’s okay.

But Van Drew has just sent himself into oblivion. For one thing, he’s party-switching himself into the minority. That’s a foolish proposition right there, particularly since with so many Republican retirements this year, no one realistically expects Republicans to retake the majority next year–impeachment or no impeachment.

And, unlike the Senate, members of the House minority have essentially no power to affect policy whatsoever. Members in the minority can make speeches and send press releases. That’s the extent of it.

So Jeff Van Drew has traded the potential to move up the ranks in the majority, for that. All over one vote. Yes, a consequential vote, but a single vote nonetheless.

The last time Congress saw big-time party-switching, it was back in 1995 after the Republicans had taken control over both chambers of Congress for the first time in 40 years. In that case, you had Democrats rushing to become Republicans–but at least it was to remain in the majority.

That made sense, at least in a cravenly political way.

And so far, we’ve only been talking about the remainder of Van Drew’s current term.

Reelection?

Brigid Callahan Harrison, a local political science professor, had already signalled that she would challenge Van Drew in a primary.

She now becomes his natural Democratic opponent next year. And although Van Drew’s district was previously held by a Republican, that was by a single Republican for 20 years.

Without a long-term incumbent, New Jersey’s Second Congressional District reverts back to what it is: a total swing district with a Cook Partisan Voter Index of only R+1.


That means that a Republican has no real advantage here. And now the Democratic voters who put Jeff Van Drew in that seat last year will be highly motivated by betrayal now to take him out of it.

Content from The Bipartisan Press. All Rights Reserved.



Please note comments may not immediately appear as they pass through our spam queue.

COMMENTS (3)

  • comment-avatar
    Peter Barges December 14, 2019

    Honest man can not do dishonest thing, if they are truly honest.

    • comment-avatar

      Which is why we know for a fact Trump is guilty Peter Bargas. He is the furtherest thing from an honest man.

      And it is obvious that Van Drew switched parties to have at least some chance of being reelected. Internal polls showed only 24% of primary voters would relected him. 54% someone new. With numbers like that his only craven political chance was to switch parties. Hes a real PoS.

  • comment-avatar
    CalOldBlue December 15, 2019

    Not mentioned: why would he assume, with his voting record, he can secure the Republican nomination in that district? He’s signed his own political death warrant… he’ll be primaried from the right and will never see the general election.